Skip to main content

Mapping Researchers, Methodologies, and Institutes in a Knowledge Graph


Here I showcase implementation of a knowledge graph that aggregates and structures scientific studies around sequencing technologies, methodologies, researchers, and institutes, enabling relationship-driven analysis that goes beyond traditional tabular or bibliometric approaches.

The graph integrates studies covering major sequencing modalities, including RNA-seq, scRNA-seq, WGS, WES, and ATAC-seq, and explicitly models how methods, platforms, institutions, and geographies intersect.
While implemented using graph-native technology, the conceptual model is portable to relational or hybrid SQL–graph architectures.

Core Database Structure


Core Knowledge Graph Structure

The schema is designed to capture who uses what, where, and how, supporting queries such as:

  • Which institutes are driving adoption of emerging sequencing methods?
  • How platform usage differs across countries or research domains
  • How specific methodologies diffuse over time across the research landscape

Visualising Query Capabilities


The graph enables flexible traversal across entities, allowing rapid exploration of:

  • studies linked to specific journals or methodologies
  • researchers grouped by geography or institutional affiliation
Traversal from Journals to StudiesTraversal from Country to Studies

📽️ Additional Media


Short screen recordings demonstrating interactive graph exploration are available here and here.

Querying Platforms, Techniques, and Methodologies


The plots below illustrate how the graph can be queried to surface technology prevalence and methodological patterns across the literature.

Sequencing Platform Mentions
BGI PlatformIllumina PlatformNanopore PlatformPacBio PlatformThermoFisher Platform
Single-read vs Paired-end & WGS vs WES (Example: Germany)
Single vs Paired EndWGS vs WES in Germany
Single-cell and Spatial Transcriptomics
scRNA-seq AnalysisSpatial Transcriptomics Analysis